The problem with breed specific legislation
Dangerous dogs and breed specific legislation laws are currently in place designed to protect the public from dangerous dogs unfortunately, these laws are not strict enough and are not enforced consistently. Breed-specific laws can be difficult to enforce, especially when a dog's breed can't easily be determined or if it is of mixed breed frequently, breed-specific legislation focuses on dogs with a certain appearance or physical characteristics, instead of an actual breed. Because breed-specific legislation targets an entire population of family pets based on breed, this article argues for a better examination of the reliability of breed identification and the science used to uphold the constitutionality of the legislation.
Lennox case shows how breed-specific laws aren’t just a us problem responsible pet ownership, not breed-specific legislation, is the best approach to protecting the public read why this is a global issue. Breed specific legislation, ie targeting a particular breed such as american pit bull terriers, has generally been discredited in actual experience of cities, professionals and academic research as being both ineffective and expensive. Breed-specific legislation's wiki: breed-specific legislation is a law passed by a legislative body pertaining to a specific breed or breeds of domesticated animals in practice, it generally refers to laws pertaining to a specific dog breed or breeds. Breed-specific legislation in australia there are currently two types of breed-specific legislation: under the commonwealth customs legislation there is a ban on the importation of several specific breeds of dogs japanese tosa, fila brasiliero, dogo argentino, perrode presa canario, and american pit bull terrier.
(a) experience in the uk and europe in relation to breed specific legislation (b) the current provisions of the nsw companion animals act 1998 in relation to dangerous dog attacks, dangerous dogs and restricted breeds. In many ways, the montreal ban is an exemplar of breed specific legislation (bsl) or policies that ban-or otherwise restrict-ownership of a specific dog breed or group of breeds. Breed-specific legislation was enacted to protect the public from certain breeds deemed dangerous, such as pit bulls, rottweilers, etc however, the problem inherent in breed-specific laws, is that there are no reliable means of making accurate breed identification. Repealing breed-specific legislation moving beyond breed to save dogs and strengthen communities foreword the most obvious problem with breed-specific legislation is that it is in no way specific like “hound,” the term “pit bull” for dogs, perhaps one of the worst threats is breed-specific legislation, or bsl bsl restricts. Specific breed of dog as a quick and easy solution to animal control problems however, breed-specific legislation does not address the underlying problem of irresponsible ownership.
Why doesn’t breed specific legislation work (pitbull bans) when it comes to laws that regulate “dangerous dogs,” there is at least one fact that is hard to dispute: dogs that run loose unsupervised, dogs that bite or attack people or other animals, and dogs that just plain cause a nuisance are a real and often serious problem in communities across the country. According to best friends’ breed-specific legislation and dog breed fiscal impact calculator, just to police dog owners (not take them in, or anything else), washington state would look at about $6,167,201 to do that. Breed-specific legislation applies only to dogs of a certain appearance, not to any and all dogs it does not take into account how the owner has raised, trained, or managed the dog it does not take into account the dog’s actual behavior.
The problem with breed specific legislation
The problem of dangerous dogs is a social one and needs to be tackled through the enforcement of effective legislation that seeks to curb irresponsible owners of all types of dog and better educate the dog owning public to prevent incidents before they occur. Bsl stands for breed-specific legislation -- laws and regulations, enacted at the city or county level, that ban or restrict the keeping of dogs by breed, typically targeting pit bulls. In that way, specific types of dogs become a stand-in for other, deeper problems: recessions, changing demographics, social inequality but the tide on breed bans is changing, with at least twenty.
Banning a breed based on generalizations, as malcolm gladwell so eloquently points out in his article troublemakers: what pit bulls can teach us about profiling (the new yorker, february 6, 2006. Breed specific legislation breed specific legislation in colorado defines a “pit bull” as, “any dog that is an american pit bull terrier, american staffordshire terrier, staffordshire bull terrier, or any dog displaying the majority of physical traits of any one (1) or more of the above breeds, or any dog exhibiting those distinguishing characteristics which substantially conform to the. I felt early on in my research about breed specific legislation – or more appropriately, breed discrimination – that there were other issues embedded under the surface to disguise what this was truly about. Proponents of breed specific legislation claim that enacting breed specific laws will help to protect the general public from dangerous and unwarranted attacks, particularly against children even well-behaved dogs can be unpredictable.
What is a bsl bsl stands for breed specific legislation a bsl can be anything from requiring special licensing of a breed or breeds (breed restriction) to the total elimination of a breed (breed ban) why is bsl bad bsl fails to target the problem: bad dog owners those who are causing the problems with their dogs will not care about the law. Breed specific legislation or bsl is a statute or regulation that is directed toward one or more specific breeds of dogs bsl started in the early 1980s when the number of deaths and serious injuries caused by certain breeds the problem with breed specific legislation essay. Proponents for breed specific legislation believe that eliminating a target breed from the population will ultimately decrease the number of dog bites and severe dog attacks and consequently, reduces the financial and emotional cost to communities associated with dog bite injury.